circulating for some time on YouTube a satirical video covered with the title unfair "election propaganda of the Pirates .
Its author, in his blog a detailed explanation of this video posted here that I would like to take apart.
"At first I thought it was a very intelligent form of satire. Only then I understood that this is really intended to be meant seriously. "
In fact, pirates attack the party and its supporters like the irony or the Sarkasmuskiste. But this is not a problem because the potential pirates all voters are intelligent enough to understand that - even at first contact.
Regrettably it is not possible to explain the irrational thinking part of the population approve Lockversprechen other parties as such.
"The name appears me unfortunate. Associative I associate with the first moment of the sea pirates, soon after pirates. "
The pirates have here an example to other parties made. The Christian Democratic Union, for example, makes the first moment the impression of a religious party based on the Bible, in the second moment, she seems out because of our strict separation of religion and government in place.
"biggest criticism on my part, however, the two campaign spots, you are a terrorist!" and can you tell you that? "I for better understanding of my clips also recommend to anyone."These spots
clarify ironic and perhaps a bit exaggerated to some of the conditions in Germany. In contrast to the other parties, the choice spots are filled only with tempting promises, the Pirate Party in order to research and encourages reflection. Because unlike most other parties, they do not rely on empty promises, but can their true goals and intentions that explain each benefit, and thus promote.
"Despite the fact meaningful intentions of the Pirate Party, do you feel as intelligent citizens consequently not taken seriously."
An intelligent citizens would sought even before the video for alternatives to the current government because he would be aware that things could not go on like that. He would have met with the pirates, and would have to agree as a rational person at least 90% of the party program. He empfände the video as I do as part of a little exaggerated, but by and large enlightening.
"It appears - and that's the magic word: appears - as if you ask a naive, manipulated voters, which is almost everything for fear of the the clip shown, alleged intentions and capabilities of the state as a a deeper understanding should be associated belief of the problems the pirates vote for. "
Strangely, that's exactly the tactics of most other parties, including that of Ms von der Leyen, who has been with her child pornography blocking many unenlightened to CDU voters.
In contrast, clears the video of the Pirate Party as already said on spurs and to investigate whether it really is because Sun
"The spots meet in some respects the character of a propaganda film. Some ways a hate image against the existing government is fueled. "
If facts and information propaganda match, I agree with the first sentence to. The image hatred against the government sets itself each time that the facts shown, does not agree and feels so betrayed. Someone who agrees with this practice, sees the pirates as a party, contrary to their own interests.
"It seems as if the current government had no other worries than to found a state of total surveillance."
The "alarming" to the Pirates is similar to the warnings of the consequences of Kllimawandels. It is argued here, especially in the long run.
At this point I would like to bring something I heard recently from one of my very valued Nightline-radio host have and which I also fully agree:
would include the development of fundamental rights and the surveillance measures of recent years occurred within a few weeks, there had been a revolution, because that would be making no citizens.
The politicians are now experienced enough to know that they can enforce anything if it happens gradually over a long period of time. The desired result is indeed only after years there, but it is there and that without popular resistance.
This has been developed in recent years and that will continue, if not finally, a party is sitting in parliament, which will stop this development. By the way, are the CDU and SPD apparently the only ones who support this slow development of a surveillance state - but it is enough, yes.
to paragraphs "THE VIDEO CAMERAS AND THE SCANNER", "fingerprints" and "LOVE THE DATA:
The more the government will logged and tracked, the easier it will be for terrorists to plan a targeted attack. A skilled hacker will probably be able to hack into the systems of government and in turn increases the probability that the attack succeeds.
you are then able to fake fingerprints or inject false data and everything is attached to an innocent person, the his life is no longer happy.
is clear that scenario unlikely, but it is no more unlikely than that in Germany takes place at a terrorist attack.
it, it would also not only about their own data, but also the vast amounts of money that the state invests in such activities - the result, it is just not worth it and are our money!
has also proven the past so many times that data collection can go bad in my pants.
"Not only that it is quite painful, it's kind of creepy with a device that can definitely be called as a weapon to a shoot others, real people. "
Much scarier is that we are in our free country as young adults are forced into military service in the weapon, where we learn real weapons on real people to shoot. Out you come, will probably always refused abound with insufficient grounds and only a yard long essays a la "Why did I refuse the service of the weapon" in which mainly the people who read through the crap that the doctors, the survey take, and so on swallow a lot of state money.
"If you like time for an event or would like to use some copyrighted music, this is accomplished through the GEMA actually quite smooth. In the interest of the artist it is. "
Who is the GEMA that they allowed themselves to determine where and whose works may be played when and how long ago how many and by whom?
GEMA takes a lot of money and gives little of the artists who have come from somewhere, all the money for the employee survey, etc., too.
copyright, GEMA, GEZ - All this is not a good solution. The pirates want to find a solution that benefits the artists, but not to consumers makes life difficult.
And here again: Selects Pirates! : P
Otherwise, I can give you in a few years, the blame for the shit.
0 comments:
Post a Comment